Siirry ensisijaiseen navigaatioon, Skip to primary navigation, Hoppa till primärnavigering Siirry hakuun, Skip to search, Hoppa till sök Siirry päänavigaatioon, Skip to main navigation, Hoppa till huvudnavigering Siirry sisältöalueeseen, Skip to main content, Hoppa till huvudinnehåll Siirry alatunnistenavigaatioon, Skip to footer navigation, Hoppa till sidfältnavigering
  1. Suomeksi
  2. På svenska
  3. In English
Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority
  • Facts & Advice
     

    Marketing and advertising

    • Good marketing practices
    • Indicating prices
    • Sales and offers
    • Corrections of mistakes in advertising
    • Recognisability of advertising
    • Direct marketing may be refused
    • Claims and comparisons
    • More topics

    Defects, delays and reclamations

    • Defective goods
    • Defective services
    • Delays in delivery
    • Defective cars
    • Defects in housing transactions
    • Residential care housing
    • Telephone and internet connections
    • More topics

    Buying and selling

    • Guarantee
    • Customer services
    • Presents and gift vouchers
    • Contracts
    • Cancelling a purchase
    • Scams
    • Gym memberships
    • More topics

    Travel and instructions for agencies

    • Travel and transport
    • Air passengers´ rights
    • How to register a travel company
    • Instructions for registered travel companies
    • Register of package travel agencies
    • If a travel agency goes bankrupt
    • More topics

    Payment, bills and collection

    • Financial management
    • Receipt
    • Credit
    • Payment arrangements
    • Loss of a payment card
    • Delayed payment and collection
    • More topics

    Competition affairs

    • Competition restraints
    • Merger control
    • Competition neutrality
    • Do you suspect a competition restraint? Tip us off!
    • Be the first one to leave a cartel
    • More topics
    • Marketing and advertising
    • Buying, selling and making contracts
    • Payment, bills, debt collection
    • Defects and delays
    • Travelling and travel agencies
    • Competition Affairs
  • Decisions & publications
     

    Competition affairs

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • FCCA's decisions in competition affairs
    • More topics

    Motions and statements

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • FCCA's motions and statements
    • More topics

    Consumer affairs

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • Consumer ombudsmans' decisions
    • More topics

    Guidelines for consumer protection

    • Guidelines for consumer protection
    • More topics

    Search

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • Advanced search
    • More topics

    Publications

    • Guidelines on the application of the Competition Act
    • Joint Nordic Reports
    • More topics
    • Competition Affairs
    • Consumer affairs
    • Motions and statements
    • Publications
  • Current issues
    • Press releases
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • FCCA
    • Online consumer services
    • The Consumer Ombudsman
    • European Consumer Centre in Finland
    • Organisation
    • Responsibilities
    • Statistics
    • Planning and monitoring of operations
    • Contact information
    • Online services and privacy protection
  • Consumer Advice
    • File a complaint with the company
    • Duties of the consumer advise
  • Contact
    • Competition affairs
    • Consumer affairs
    • Administration
    • ICT and digitalisation
    • Management
    • Advocacy and research
    • Communications
    • Data protection
  • Frontpage
  • Current issues
  • Press releases
  • 2016
https://www.kkv.fi/en/current-issues/press-releases/2016/1.12.2016-eu-court-of-justice-forbids-dividing-price-into-components/
  • Frontpage
  • Current issues
  • Press releases
  • 2016

Current issues

  • Press releases
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • News
  • Newsletters

EU Court of Justice forbids dividing price into components

Listen
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
1 December 2016

The European Court of Justice issued a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. Indicating the price is misleading if the price is divided into components with only one of them being emphasised, thereby giving the consumer a mistaken impression about its price and leading to a decision the consumer would not otherwise have taken.

The Court of Glostrup in Denmark had requested the Court to make a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The reason for the request was a case about Canal Digital marketing concerning whether Canal Digital’s television package advertisements on television and the Internet had indicated clearly enough to consumers that in addition to a monthly price for the channel package they also had to pay card service every six months.

The Court was requested to give an interpretation on Articles 6 and 7 which under the Finnish Consumer Protection Act correspond to giving false or misleading information or omitting material information, and duty to provide information when offering specific consumer goods.

According to the Court, the price of the product is a significant factor when an average consumer makes purchase decisions. Naturally it is not enough to simply give the price details, it is also important how the information is presented.  This information may not be presented in an unclear, unnecessarily difficult or ambiguous way nor, from the consumer's perspective, too late or otherwise in an untimely manner if doing so prevents the consumer from understanding the total price of the product.

The Court considers it misleading advertising if a product's price is divided into many components and emphasis is only placed on one of them, provided such a practice gives the wrong impression about a favourable price, causing consumers to make a purchase decision they otherwise would not have made.

The Court of Glostrup that requested a preliminary ruling will, based on the preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice, decide later whether Canal Digital has engaged in misleading marketing or neglected its duty to provide information.

The decision by the European Court of Justice is in line with the observations made by the Finnish Government and the Consumer Ombudsman. The Consumer Ombudsman has also expressed its opinion in previous comments that giving the price of consumer goods in marketing by dividing it up into components is misleading and therefore illegal. The previous comments by the Consumer Ombudsman have concerned, among other things, the marketing of communications services and flight tickets.

European Court of Justice decision


Updated 7.12.2016 Print
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Updated 7.12.2016 Print
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
  • © FCCA
  • Contacts
  • Feedback
  • Data protection
  • About cookies
  • Accessibility
  • © FCCA