Siirry ensisijaiseen navigaatioon, Skip to primary navigation, Hoppa till primärnavigering Siirry hakuun, Skip to search, Hoppa till sök Siirry päänavigaatioon, Skip to main navigation, Hoppa till huvudnavigering Siirry sisältöalueeseen, Skip to main content, Hoppa till huvudinnehåll Siirry alatunnistenavigaatioon, Skip to footer navigation, Hoppa till sidfältnavigering
  1. Suomeksi
  2. På svenska
  3. In English
Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority
  • Facts & Advice
     

    Marketing and advertising

    • Good marketing practices
    • Indicating prices
    • Sales and offers
    • Corrections of mistakes in advertising
    • Recognisability of advertising
    • Direct marketing may be refused
    • Claims and comparisons
    • More topics

    Defects, delays and reclamations

    • Defective goods
    • Defective services
    • Delays in delivery
    • Defective cars
    • Defects in housing transactions
    • Residential care housing
    • Telephone and internet connections
    • More topics

    Buying and selling

    • Guarantee
    • Customer services
    • Presents and gift vouchers
    • Contracts
    • Cancelling a purchase
    • Scams
    • Gym memberships
    • More topics

    Travel and instructions for agencies

    • Travel and transport
    • Air passengers´ rights
    • How to register a travel company
    • Instructions for registered travel companies
    • Register of package travel agencies
    • If a travel agency goes bankrupt
    • More topics

    Payment, bills and collection

    • Financial management
    • Receipt
    • Credit
    • Payment arrangements
    • Loss of a payment card
    • Delayed payment and collection
    • More topics

    Competition affairs

    • Competition restraints
    • Merger control
    • Competition neutrality
    • Do you suspect a competition restraint? Tip us off!
    • Be the first one to leave a cartel
    • More topics
    • Marketing and advertising
    • Buying, selling and making contracts
    • Payment, bills, debt collection
    • Defects and delays
    • Travelling and travel agencies
    • Competition Affairs
  • Decisions & publications
     

    Competition affairs

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • FCCA's decisions in competition affairs
    • More topics

    Motions and statements

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • FCCA's motions and statements
    • More topics

    Consumer affairs

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • Consumer ombudsmans' decisions
    • More topics

    Guidelines for consumer protection

    • Guidelines for consumer protection
    • More topics

    Search

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • Advanced search
    • More topics

    Publications

    • Guidelines on the application of the Competition Act
    • Joint Nordic Reports
    • More topics
    • Competition Affairs
    • Consumer affairs
    • Motions and statements
    • Publications
  • Current issues
    • Press releases
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • FCCA
    • Online consumer services
    • The Consumer Ombudsman
    • European Consumer Centre in Finland
    • Organisation
    • Responsibilities
    • Statistics
    • Planning and monitoring of operations
    • Contact information
    • Online services and privacy protection
  • Consumer Advice
    • File a complaint with the company
    • Duties of the consumer advise
  • Contact
    • Competition affairs
    • Consumer affairs
    • Administration
    • ICT and digitalisation
    • Management
    • Advocacy and research
    • Communications
    • Data protection
  • Frontpage
  • Current issues
  • Press releases
  • 2016
https://www.kkv.fi/en/current-issues/press-releases/2016/14.9.2016-consumer-ombudsman-takes-finkraft-oy-to-market-court-for-increase-in-electricity-contract-prices/
  • Frontpage
  • Current issues
  • Press releases
  • 2016

Current issues

  • Press releases
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • News
  • Newsletters

Consumer Ombudsman takes Finkraft Oy to Market Court for increase in electricity contract prices

Listen
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
14 September 2016

Finkraft Oy has implemented a price increase in ongoing electricity contracts, claiming the increase was necessary due to changes in the market price of electricity and the company's operating costs.  However, the Electricity Market Act and the Consumer Protection Act impose limitations on the electricity supplier's right to make unilateral and material changes to a contract.

During 2015, the Consumer Ombudsman received complaints on the operating methods of Finkraft Oy. The company had implemented price increases in ongoing electricity contracts, raising the consumer price by 40–60 per cent. For consumers, this change in the price of electricity supplied by Finkraft Oy translated into a one-time increase of up to 2.5 c/kWh. Finkraft Oy claimed a price increase was necessary due to changes in the market price of electricity and the company's operating costs.

Ongoing electricity contracts are often long-term agreements, and changes in circumstances, such as an increase in the acquisition cost, provide grounds for the supplier to increase the contract price. However, the Electricity Market Act and the Consumer Protection Act impose limitations on the electricity supplier's right to make unilateral and material changes to a contract.

The electricity supplier must be able to prove that the reported grounds for price adjustment, such as changes in the market price of electricity, are real and in line with the consumer price adjustment. In early 2015, when Finkraft Oy introduced its price increases, no changes had occurred in the SPOT price of the Nordic power pool that would have warranted the price increases of more than 60% implemented by the company.

On 13 September 2016, the Consumer Ombudsman took the matter to the Market Court for resolution.  The Consumer Ombudsman demands that the Market Court prohibit the price increase by Finkraft Oy in ongoing electricity contracts based on changes in the market price of electricity, or in the company's operating costs that would materially change the content of the contract.

The Market Court is further requested to prohibit any reference by Finkraft Oy to changes in the market price or operating costs as grounds for price increases, unless the company is able to prove that the said changes are similar in scale to the price increase imposed on consumers.

The Consumer Ombudsman also calls for the injunctions to be made more effective by imposing a penalty payment of EUR 200,000.


Updated 15.9.2016 Print
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Updated 15.9.2016 Print
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
  • © FCCA
  • Contacts
  • Feedback
  • Data protection
  • About cookies
  • Accessibility
  • © FCCA