Siirry ensisijaiseen navigaatioon, Skip to primary navigation, Hoppa till primärnavigering Siirry hakuun, Skip to search, Hoppa till sök Siirry päänavigaatioon, Skip to main navigation, Hoppa till huvudnavigering Siirry sisältöalueeseen, Skip to main content, Hoppa till huvudinnehåll Siirry alatunnistenavigaatioon, Skip to footer navigation, Hoppa till sidfältnavigering
  1. Suomeksi
  2. På svenska
  3. In English
Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority
  • Facts & Advice
     

    Marketing and advertising

    • Good marketing practices
    • Indicating prices
    • Sales and offers
    • Corrections of mistakes in advertising
    • Recognisability of advertising
    • Direct marketing may be refused
    • Claims and comparisons
    • More topics

    Defects, delays and reclamations

    • Defective goods
    • Defective services
    • Delays in delivery
    • Defective cars
    • Defects in housing transactions
    • Residential care housing
    • Telephone and internet connections
    • More topics

    Buying and selling

    • Guarantee
    • Customer services
    • Presents and gift vouchers
    • Contracts
    • Cancelling a purchase
    • Scams
    • Gym memberships
    • More topics

    Travel and instructions for agencies

    • Travel and transport
    • Air passengers´ rights
    • How to register a travel company
    • Instructions for registered travel companies
    • Register of package travel agencies
    • If a travel agency goes bankrupt
    • More topics

    Payment, bills and collection

    • Financial management
    • Receipt
    • Credit
    • Payment arrangements
    • Loss of a payment card
    • Delayed payment and collection
    • More topics

    Competition affairs

    • Competition restraints
    • Merger control
    • Competition neutrality
    • Do you suspect a competition restraint? Tip us off!
    • Be the first one to leave a cartel
    • More topics
    • Marketing and advertising
    • Buying, selling and making contracts
    • Payment, bills, debt collection
    • Defects and delays
    • Travelling and travel agencies
    • Competition Affairs
  • Decisions & publications
     

    Competition affairs

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • FCCA's decisions in competition affairs
    • More topics

    Motions and statements

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • FCCA's motions and statements
    • More topics

    Consumer affairs

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • Consumer ombudsmans' decisions
    • More topics

    Guidelines for consumer protection

    • Guidelines for consumer protection
    • More topics

    Search

    Documents are only in Finnish.

    • Advanced search
    • More topics

    Publications

    • Guidelines on the application of the Competition Act
    • Joint Nordic Reports
    • More topics
    • Competition Affairs
    • Consumer affairs
    • Motions and statements
    • Publications
  • Current issues
    • Press releases
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • FCCA
    • Online consumer services
    • The Consumer Ombudsman
    • European Consumer Centre in Finland
    • Organisation
    • Responsibilities
    • Statistics
    • Planning and monitoring of operations
    • Contact information
    • Online services and privacy protection
  • Consumer Advice
    • File a complaint with the company
    • Duties of consumer advisors
  • Contact
    • Competition affairs
    • Consumer affairs
    • Administration
    • ICT and digitalisation
    • Management
    • Advocacy and research
    • Communications
    • Data protection
  • Frontpage
  • Current issues
  • Press releases
  • 2017
https://www.kkv.fi/en/current-issues/press-releases/2017/7.12.2017-the-consumer-ombudsman-demands-injunctions-on-four-companies-for-misleading-comparison-prices/
  • Frontpage
  • Current issues
  • Press releases
  • 2017

Current issues

  • Press releases
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • News
  • Newsletters

The Consumer Ombudsman demands injunctions on four companies for misleading comparison prices

Listen
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
7.12.2018

The Consumer Ombudsman has started proceedings in the Market Court against Scandinavian Outdoor Oy, SGN Sportia Oy, L-Fashion Group Oy and Kruunukaluste Oy. Conditional fines of EUR 100,000 are proposed in order to enforce the injunctions.

The Consumer Ombudsman has placed the online marketing of sports equipment and furniture companies under special scrutiny since August 2016 in order to determine how comparison prices, percentages or other expressions referring to discounts are used in the marketing of the companies in the field. The intention has been to assess whether the discounts marketed to consumers are real.

Before submitting the matters to be decided by the Market Court, the Consumer Ombudsman has provided these companies with guidance on statutory requirements and Market Court case law as well as had negotiations with the companies in an effort to reach an amicable settlement. As these companies have not changed their marketing despite the guidance provided and their promises to do so, the Consumer Ombudsman issued injunctions against them in summer 2017. As the companies objected to the injunctions, the Consumer Ombudsman took them to the Market Court.

In addition to taking these companies to the Market Court, the Consumer Ombudsman has issued an injunction against Suomen Retkitukku Oy and notice of a conditional fine to enforce the injunction. The company did not demonstrate that it had ever charged the comparison price for the products that the injunction was based on. The company’s marketing was such that it was likely to hamper consumers’ understanding of the normal price levels of the company and, consequently, of the actual benefit of the reduced prices.

The aim of using comparison prices and discount percentages is to create the impression in the minds of consumers that the discounts are considerable. Healthy price competition and occasional discounts on products benefit consumers. However, misleading comparison prices and discount percentages hamper the consumers' understanding of the store's normal price levels and of the actual size of the advertised discount.

The primary objective of the Consumer Ombudsman is to make the company acting in breach of the law stop doing so, or to persuade it to change its actions voluntarily. If necessary, the Consumer Ombudsman takes any coercive measures required in the case, or refers the matter to be heard by a court of law. In practice, an injunction enforced with a penalty payment is issued in such situations. A decision on the injunction is made by the Market Court, based on an application submitted by the Consumer Ombudsman.

The Consumer Ombudsman may also impose injunctions directly in cases deemed to be of lesser significance in terms of the application of the law or otherwise. An injunction becomes void if the company announces that it objects within a given time limit.

The Market Court and the Consumer Ombudsman may both issue a notice of a conditional fine in order to lend force to the injunction. If, despite the ban, the company continues to act illegally, the Consumer Ombudsman may request the Market Court to order that the conditional fine be paid.


Further information:

  • The Consumer Ombudsman issued an injunction against four furniture stores due to misleading advertising. The FCCA press release 13.10.2017.
  • The The Consumer Ombudsman issued an injunction against seven sports shops due to misleading advertising. The FCCA press release.28.6.2017.
  • Consumer Ombudsman tells sports shops to give up recommended retail prices and recommended prices. The FCCA press release 2.3.2016.
  • Consumer Ombudsmans' decisions and rulings (in Finnish). The FCCA website.
  • Consumer decisions in the Market Court and in the Supreme Court (in Finnish). The FCCA website.

Updated 12.12.2017 Print
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Updated 12.12.2017 Print
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
  • © FCCA
  • Contacts
  • Feedback
  • Data protection
  • About cookies
  • Accessibility
  • © FCCA